11th September 2017


The Park Home Owners JUSTICE Campaign
President:  Lord Graham of Edmonton

APPG (all party parliamentary group) on Park Homes to elect Officers
and Re-Register the group in the new Parliament.

Meeting to he held on September 13th at 9.30am in Room U Portcullis House

As a Member of Parliament may I respectfully ask that - if your diary allows and you have an interest in Park Homes - that you attend the above meeting in Portcullis House. 

The JUSTICE Campaign writes to you as many residents are aware that the Industries Trade Body the BH@HPA (British Holiday and Home Park Association) were the secretariat of the  APPG on Park Homes and have voiced their utter dismay that they should again been appointed as secretariat and continue to host a website for the APPG. 

I have spoken to several MPs about their worries and have been told that it is only parliamentarians who  have the right to vote for the officers and secretariat of the APPG for Park Homes.  As park home residents we consider that using the Industries trade body - the BH & HPA as the secretariat of the APPG and allowing the APPG web site to be housed under the banner of the BH & HPA from their offices is totally wrong. 

The BH & HPA are a guest organisation like our JUSTICE Campaign, NCC, IPHAS and NAPHR and I have been reliably informed that if they are again voted as the secretariat, this must be declared as their Director General is a paid employee of the BH & HPA when presumably undertaking work for the APPG for park homes. 

Park home residents feel strongly that in the interests of fairness and transparency the secretariat should be totally independent from the guest groups (of apposing sides) who should not be considered for this position or any working role - but should be done by an independent and transparent source thus avoiding the possibility of any benefit for their own organisation.  Therefore, on behalf of the many park home residents that have contacted me, may I respectfully ask you to consider this if you should attend.

May I also request that if you have Park Home Residents in your constituency that you consider joining this very worthwhile group.

With every good wish


On the following link, Park Home Residents can read the minutes and draft minutes of the  APPG meetings.  You will see from my letter to Mr. Chope (below) that I have not agreed the 13th March 2017 Draft Minutes.  I believe that it is important for all park home residents that what the Minister actually said regarding the 10% commission charge is accurately documented for future reference and I have asked for the minutes to be altered accordingly.



Dear Mr. Chope

Reference:  APPG on Park Homes. Draft minutes of the meeting held on the 13th March 2017

Thank you for the draft minutes, however I feel they have not adequately covered certain topics of importance that were said by the Minister and myself.

At the end of the Minister's address  to the meeting, he said "I will not be reviewing the 10%"  which is not included in the minutes.

  1. I then referred the Minister to the Hansard quotation of the debate on the 30th October 2014 when all MP's unanimously voted for an independent and transparent review of the 10% commission charge.  (not included in the minutes.)

The remainder of what I said is quoted (a little out of context) in para 8 on page 5 of the minutes.

Following my reference to the Minister of Hansard.  The Minister said that  "He would reconsider"  (not included in the minutes.)

As I know you will be aware from the rally and presentation to Downing Street that you attended, it is most important to thousands of park home residents that this reference by the Minister of his reconsideration of the 10% review is documented. 

May I ask if you would kindly have the minutes altered to show exactly what the Minister said on this topic.

With best wishes





The minutes of the inaugural meeting of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Park Homes which took place in Room U, Portcullis House, Westminster on Wednesday 13 September 2017, commencing 9.30am.
 PRESENT:  Christopher Chope OBE, MP (convenor and Chairman) Peter Aldous MP Richard Benyon MP Sir Peter Bottomley MP Chris Davies MP Lee Rowley MP Martin Whitfield MP
 The Lord Teverson
 Helen Gilfedder, representing Stephen Barclay MP Alex Denvir, representing Roberta Blackman-Woods MP
 Connor Power, CLG Robert Skeoch, CLG William Tandoh, CLG
 Victor Davey, Silver Lakes Ibraheem Dulmeer, Lease Richard Hand, Lease Paul Holland, SODC&VWHDC Mervyn Kohler, AgeUK Ros Pritchard OBE, British Holiday & Home Parks Association (BH&HPA) Anne Webb, volunteer
 APOLOGIES:  Steve Brine MP, Mark Menzies MP, Nick Thomas-Symonds MP, Michael Tomlinson MP, Baroness Scott of Needham
 Alicia Dunne, Brian Doick, Lisa Osborn, Sonia McColl, Alan Savory
 1. Approval of Minutes 
 The meeting APPROVED of the minutes of the last meeting of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Park Homes which took place in Committee Room 12, Westminster on Monday, 13 March 2017, commencing at 16.30.
 2. APPG on Park Homes
 a) Name
 The meeting AGREED to re-register the group with the name: ‘All-Party Parliamentary Group on Park Homes’.  
b) Statement of Purpose
The meeting AGREED the statement of purpose of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Park Homes was to:
‘Bring together parliamentarians, park homeowners and industry representatives to discuss issues of common interest including legislation and its enforcement to eliminate abuse and disadvantage.’ 
 c) Members
The meeting noted parliamentarians who had expressed interest in participation in the work of the group. Mrs Pritchard confirmed that the Membership List was kept up-to-date and that all Parliamentarians who had attended meetings, requested membership and/or responded to the Group’s calling notices of meetings were included.  
The meeting noted the policy that had been adopted in the previous Parliament in respect of requests received from individual park homeowners and park owners to attend meetings of the APPG. Each had been informed that individual stakeholders may be represented at meetings of the APPG by their constituency MP and/or through their national representative organisation. For homeowners, national representative organisations which were invited to attend meetings of the APPG included IPHAS, NAPHR and the Park Home Owners Justice Campaign; for park owners, these included BH&HPA and the NCC.   The meeting AGREED this policy should continue to apply.   Sir Peter Bottomley noted that it might be possible to organise an open meeting  from time to time. d) Election of Officers
 The meeting ELECTED officers to the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Park Homes as follows:
 Chair -   Christopher Chope OBE, MP (Conservative)
 Vice-Chairs -   Peter Aldous MP (Conservative) Nick Thomas-Symonds MP (Labour)) Martin Whitfield (Labour)
 Honorary Treasurers Sir Peter Bottomley MP (Conservative) Chris Davies MP (Conservative)
 e) Public Enquiry Point
 The meeting AGREED that Mrs Pritchard should serve as the public enquiry point.
 Secretary’s note: a specific email address for public enquiries to the group has been set up – 
 f) Website
 The meeting considered concerns expressed by the Park Home Owners Justice Campaign that the Group’s webpage should be hosted by an independent body. Mrs Pritchard reported that a dedicated webpage for the Group had been published following the request of Steve Brine MP at the inaugural meeting in the previous parliament. This provided the APPG’s statement of purpose, contact details and elected officers and was used to publish minutes of the Group’s meetings. She said there was no requirement for the Group to publish a webpage and offered to take it down since there were concerns. 
 However, the meeting applauded the transparency of publishing minutes of the Group’s meetings online and AGREED that the webpage should continue as previously.
 g) Secretariat
 It was noted that Ms Webb had volunteered to serve as minuting secretary for the Group, a role she had also undertaken for previous APPGs following her retirement as Editor of ‘Park Home Magazine’. The meeting expressed thanks to Ms Webb for her time and gratefully AGREED that she should continue in this voluntary work. 
 h) Re-registration
 The meeting AGREED that Mr Chope MP should complete and return the Group’s Registration Form to the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner.
 3. Update from the CLG Park Homes team  
 Mr Skeoch reported that part 1 of the call for evidence had been published and responses were currently being considered, the results would be published shortly, along with Part 2 of the Call for Evidence which would be a general review of the Mobile Homes Act 2013. It was hoped that it would be published before the end of the calendar year. 
 The Chairman asked when the APPG would know whether the Minister would take on board a further review of commission. Mr Skeoch said that this was not in the scope of Part 2 of the review of the Mobile Homes Act 2013, but Ministers were aware that there was a call for a review of commission and that would be considered when reviewing the responses. If there was anything to be done on commission, there would be a separate consultation. 
He noted commission had been looked at to see if it was reasonable and the DCLG Select Committee considered that it was. The Department understood the feelings of those who had to pay this fee but there was also the question of economic viability.
 Mrs Pritchard said that the BH&HPA employed surveyors in Wales to calculate the maintenance costs that would be required for parks in the coming decade who found that, without commission, the small park businesses were likely to go to the wall. She noted that it would be inappropriate to have laws which differed by size of business.
 Mr Skeoch said this is the challenge that the English government had to deal with. The Welsh government was now looking at it and finding the same problem – that it would have an impact on smaller businesses. There was also the concern that removing one source of income would necessitate a change to other sources. 
 Mr Davey commented that if no-one moved off a site, the owner did not get any commission money. Therefore, it was an incentive for the park owner to get people to move off the site. 
 Mrs Pritchard responded by saying that calculations have been made averaging over a 10-year period and these showed that commission was a necessary income stream. Mr Davey said that there were three homes for sale on his park and when these are sold the park owner will have received £45,000 for doing nothing.  
 The Chairman commented that the enthusiasm with which Mr Davey put over his point was reflected in the fact that many people had signed the Justice Campaign’s petition calling for a review of the commission rate. He added that one of the reasons for commission amounts being so high was that the value of park homes had increased. Under current legislation, the 10% was a maximum but it was the figure that was invariably used. So, whether the businesses were large or small, they were maximising their income on the disposal of a park home. That was why residents were asking for the commission rate to be looked at again. 
The Chairman said there was some evidence that the larger site-owning organisations were picking off the smaller ones and sometimes the owners of those large companies were not very desirable.   
 Mr Skeoch said that Ministers would be looking at this issue to see if they needed to have another review, adding that it would not be part of the proposed Call for Evidence. He noted that the Housing Minister had a tremendous workload but hoped that he would come to address an APPG meeting at some future stage. The matter was important for residents and the industry and there was a need to get it right. He added that the other factor which had to be considered was that pitch fees were regulated. They could only go up or down by inflation. If a decision was taken to do away with commission, there might have to be different regulation of pitch fees which could lead to situations where residents could not afford to pay them and remain on the park. It would be important to ensure that if one income stream was lost there wasn’t abuse elsewhere. 
 The Chairman said that there might be scope for Mr Davey’s point to be looked at again and not merely to respond by saying that it had been dealt with in the past.  Mr Skeoch said it was looked at during the previous consultation in 2007. The industry wanted no change. Residents were divided: some felt theirs was a home for life so weren’t concerned about the 10%; others said it was important to remove it but they didn’t want to pay more in pitch fees. 
 Mr Skeoch said he realised this was a current issue but it would not be part of the Call for Evidence. He said that if there was to be research into the economics of the industry he would be recommending that it should be undertaken by an independent body, but that would be a decision for the Minister. 
 Mr Davies MP commented that the commission issue would not go away. Park homes that were once selling for £100,000 were now £220,000 and this has had a knock-on effect on the commission paid to the site owner. He asked how much notice the Department would take of the research being carried out in Wales. Mr Skeoch replied that his Department would look at it but what the Welsh Government decided would be only for Wales. 
 Mr Davey said that his home was worth £150,000. It was in Chichester where property prices were high. Should the time come when he wanted to sell his home, he would have trouble finding alternative accommodation at a price he could afford and the £15,000 he had paid in commission to the park owner could make a lot of difference to where he could live.  He added that if, for example, he had owned a leasehold flat, he wouldn’t have had to pay the leaseholder a fee when he left that property. 
 The Chairman responded, saying that the law was as it was at the moment. The consequences of making a change to commission could result in changes elsewhere. For example, he asked whether the law would be changed retrospectively. 
 Mr Davey said that he had written to the Prime Minister about the 10% commission and received a response from the then Housing Minister that stated that when moving to a park home residents signed contracts saying that they would pay commission when they disposed of their homes.  
4. Any Other Business
 Responding to a question on energy efficiency in park homes, Mr Tandoh said that the Department worked with BEIS. The Chairman said that they had tried without success to get the Minister for Energy to attend a meeting of the APPG. It was noted that it was vital to ensure that all park homes were properly heated and energy efficient. Mr Skeoch added that the new Housing Minister was very aware of the park homes industry and had some park homes in his own constituency. He was committed to stopping abuses in the sector. 
The Chairman asked the DCLG representatives when they thought the Minister might be persuaded to attend an APPG meeting. Mr Skeoch said that if the Minister received an invitation he would certainly recommend that he should attend. 
 Considering harassment, Mr Benyon MP noted that at the last APPG meeting the then Housing Minister, Gavin Barwell had said that he was interested to know whether the failure of the local authorities to take action was due to lack of will or lack of resources. He thought it was a combination of both. He asked if there was any plan to improve resource allocation to local authorities so that they could take action, adding that there was a great deal of harassment on parks. Mr Skeoch confirmed the issue was being considered in the round across all housing sectors. He noted that harassment came down to the fact that the park home law was complicated and difficult to enforce. 
 Mr Holland said that in South Oxfordshire people reported harassment issues but getting evidence was very difficult as residents would not come forward. Mr Skeoch added that local authorities could not take enforcement action without witnesses, noting the need for evidence and that lack of it was often due to residents being threatened and scared. 
Mr Tandoh commented that enforcement of the mobile homes legislation was not simply about housing. It was also about health and safety on sites and those issues would be addressed in Part 2.  Problems of enforcement would also be addressed in the Call for Evidence.
 Mr Skeoch said there was also the matter of what constitutes harassment. Some residents regarded reminder letters about paying pitch fees as harassment. There were degrees of what constituted harassment and the law defined it effectively in the 1968 Act.
 Returning to the 10% commission fee, Mr Davey asked if it would take an Act of Parliament to change the rate. The chairman said that although a park home owner may enter into a contract with the site owner under which a maximum 10% was payable on the sale of that park home, it was still a matter of private contract between the parties concerning the rate of commission to be paid. All Parliament had done was set a maximum on the commission rate. 
The Chairman concluded by saying that residents wanted the law changed, the Government was currently considering housing legislation and park homes might come up within this. His message to residents was not to give up.
 5. Date and venue of next meeting
 It was AGREED that the Chairman would write to the Minister of State for Housing and Planning, asking that he join a meeting of the APPG following Government’s publication of Part 2 of the review of the Mobile Homes Act 2013.
 There being no further business, the Chairman closed the meeting at 10.30am
Please see the list below of the MPs who have registered their interest in The APPG for Park Home.
If your MPs name is not there, perhaps you would like to ask them to join and represent you.

Updated as of 22 September 2017

Adam Afriyie MP

Peter Aldous MP

Lucy Allan MP (represented by Chantelle de Villiers)

Stephen Barclay MP (represented by Helena Gilfedder)

Sir Henry Bellingham MP

Richard Benyon MP

Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods MP (represented by Alex Denvir)

Sir Peter Bottomley MP

Rt Hon Ben Bradshaw MP

Steve Brine MP  

Maria Caulfield MP (represented by Rory Tanner)

Christopher Chope OBE, MP

Chris Davies MP

Steve Double MP (represented by Anne Double)

Rebecca Harris MP

Damian Hinds MP (represented by John Hildred)

Nigel Huddleston MP

Rt Hon Sir Greg Knight MP

Jeremy Lefroy MP  

Rt Hon Dr Julian Lewis MP

Ian C. Lucas MP

Layla Moran MP (assistant Paul Edgeworth)

Mark Menzies MP

Caroline Nokes MP

Lee Rowley MP

Nick Thomas-Symonds MP

Michael Tomlinson MP (represented by Simon Gibson)

Martin Whitfield MP

Sammy Wilson MP

Dr Sarah Wollaston MP

The Lord Best OBE DL

Baroness Maddock

Baroness Scott of Needham Market

The Lord Teverson

Homeowners’ representatives:

National Association of Park Home Residents
Mr Brian Doick MBE
Independent Park Home Advisory Service
Mr Alan Savory MBE
Homeowners’ campaigns:

Park Home Owners for Justice Campaign
Mrs Sonia McColl OBE
Mr Mervyn Kohler
Ms Sue Linge
Industry representatives:

Mrs Ros Pritchard OBE
Ms Alicia Dunne
Government and agencies:

Communities & Local Government
Mr William Tandoh
Communities & Local Government
Mr Mark Nicholas
Communities & Local Government
Mr Connor Power
Communities & Local Government
Mr Robert Skeoch
Mr Ibraheem Dulmeer
Richard Hand
Ms Manjit Rai
Local Authority representatives:

Local Government Association
Hillary Tanner
Chartered Institute of Environmental Health
Bob Mayho
Representative to Park Homes Working Group
Ms Lisa Osborn
Representative to Park Homes Working Group
Mr Paul Holland

Minuting (volunteer)
Anne Webb

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.